The book gave a great ending, it was completly unpredicatable. The idea of killing the baby, and allowing the mother showed reality. Insted of letting everythign become happy and they make it, Stinebeck showed the reality of the time. He stuck to the theme of reality. Out of everything i think the ending was the greatest. Stinebeck deserves credit for writing it, he did not only portray reality he showed the nature of a family duing the time and how curroppted captialism can make society.
However my feelings about the detail still stands the same. The book had way too much detail, it couold have been shorter and keep the reader turning much faster insted of dragging on about one topic. The way he writes the book was genious he dumb down the characters dialect, and by doing this he makes the character seem much more realistic.
THe book follows a theme of sticking to gether. but at the end there are only six of them left. Ma had to let go, but why? Is she just being storng and not showing her feeling? if so is she going to break soon? Is she giving up? does she belife, and still have hope?
The secne of Rose of Sharon losing her child symbloizes that the future of the family was diminished. THe family has no other family member everyone seem as if they will die. The rain seems to symbloize their hopes drowning. While rose Of Sharon feed the grown man it showed how currupted the world was and forced people to stoop to desperate measures.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Good analysis! I like this part: "Out of everything i think the ending was the greatest. Stinebeck deserves credit for writing it, he did not only portray reality he showed the nature of a family duing the time and how curroppted captialism can make society."
ReplyDeleteAnthony... proofread!